Design Process
Stakeholder Map
A stakeholder map was developed after the analysis of literature and students and faculty of color were considered as the main stakeholders.
The key stakeholders were interconnected with other individuals and entities from four different rims; Mental health, Individual, Academic, and Organizational.
Empathy Map
Data points from stakeholder interviews and webinars were utilized for empathy maps. This approach facilitated an in-depth understanding of the wants and needs of the main stakeholders.
Persona Development
Based on empathy maps, four personas - two students and two faculty - were developed to represent the archetypes of the target audience.
These personas provided a way to gauge how the intervention should have a holistic approach to cope with their goals and frustrations.
Affinity Mapping & Design Framework
Data collected from literature, survey responses, interviews, and webinars were converted into data points on yellow sticky notes. A total of 29 insights were created through the clustering of data points via affinity mapping.
The insights were analyzed on a design framework in which the x-axis measured the level of importance and the y-axis implied the number of data points per insight cluster. Insights in the upper right quadrant were considered as priorities for ideating interventions.
Key Takeaways
Stakeholders love being different.
Microaggressions happen when senders lack exposure to different cultures.
Microaggression involves power and privilege.
Microaggressions make receivers feel attacked, unsafe, and uncomfortable.
Accumulated microaggressions are not micro.
Stakeholders want senders to be more aware of their acts and words.
Stakeholders need an opportunity to hang out and have safe conversations.
Stakeholders want better-designed training on microaggressions.
University should work as a catalyst for combating microaggressions.
Design Criteria
Four design criteria were formulated based on the analysis and synthesis of insights. They were utilized as the groundstone of ideating and validating the intervention.
INCLUSIVE
The intervention should respect stakeholders’ racial, ethnic and related cultural differences, and make them feel welcomed.
INTERACTIVE
The final concept should provide human-to-human interactions to promote better communication opportunities.
REFLECTIVE
The solution needs to prompt stakeholders to reflect on their mindsets to acknowledge that microaggressions are not the victims’ fault and they should be tackled together.
ADAPTABLE
The final concept should be flexible and adjustable to be implemented in different universities and colleges to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion
The collected ideas were put on a good and different matrix to determine which ones were unconventional and embedded the aspects of design criteria the most.
Workshop Outline
REMAP is a two-hour workshop that consists of three interactive activities and one mini-lecture on racial and ethnic microaggressions.
The primary facilitator will walk participants through the content of the lecture and the secondary facilitator is in charge of conducting three activities with attendees and encouraging their participation.
Facilitator Toolkit
A facilitator toolkit package will be provided to facilitators prior to the initiation of the workshop. The toolkit consists of a guidebook that includes facilitation guidelines and activity description and instructions, and activity props.
Workshop Activities
Final Concept Validation
Testing Feedback
Future Directions